PDA

View Full Version : What's with all the Protein?



Dave
01-19-2010, 09:03 PM
If you are doing P90X and following the Nutrition Guide, you are probably asking yourself this very question. Seriously, why so much protein? It makes Phase I - Fat Shredder - hard to follow and represents a massive change from the modern American diet of starchy carbs, high fat foods and high fructose corn syrup (items commonly found while staring out the window of your car and shouting into a box).

Here are a few of the top reasons:

1. Protein boosts your metabolism. It takes twice as much energy to break down proteins as it does carbohydrates. Your body can charge through carbs pretty easily, but it has to work to break down proteins. This means after you eat a high-protein meal your body must burn calories to break it down. Some studies have shown people with high-protein diets burned up to twice as many calories in the hours after their meals, than those on high-carb diets.

2. Protein flips your "satiety" switch. Huh? That's a fancy way of saying it makes you feel full. Would you keep eating if you felt full? Probably not. High fructose corn syrup has the exact opposite effect, which is why they make a 64 oz big gulp. That's between 800 and 1,000 calories, but you don't feel full after you drink one. "Satiety"...important stuff. You shouldn't want to eat a bag of chips and a hot dog after consuming 800 calories of anything.

3. Protein is the building block of muscle. This is oversimplified, but true. Lean protein helps promote muscle growth. Muscle burns fat. Huh? Adding muscle mass requires your body to expend energy to sustain that muscle. Adding one pound of muscle requires your body to burn up to 50 calories a day to maintain it. That's one pound folks. Try adding 10 and you can see why people that add about 10 pounds of muscle look the way they do. Their bodies are simply working more efficiently.

So, that's a nutshell of the benefits of protein. There are more, but I want to keep this simple right now. In addition, we reduce high fat foods and reduce carbs with Phase I of this plan. Trans fats and most saturated fats tend to be stored in the fat cells very easily. We are trying to change that. Some fats are healthy for you, and we'll talk more about that elsewhere. Suffice it to say now that we want to reduce the traditional American diet types of fats that are getting put in our bodies. the reasoning behind reducing starchy carbs is a little more complex. When the body takes in a lot of starchy carbs it treats them like sugars. The body responds by producing insulin to process those sugars in your blood. That in turn causes the body to store more fat because it just does not have any where to store those carbs. In addition, this insulin response actually tells your body to store fat as a precautionary measure. Keep that up long enough and you are headed for diabetes. Here's a video illustrating this principle: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNYlIcXynwE&feature=player_embedded

When you eat a lean chicken breast, you make your body work for it and it pays you back by building muscle. It also makes you feel full when you've consumed an appropriate amount of calories. When you eat a burger meal the fat gets stored as excess fat, the fries and bun create an insulin response and the high fructose corn syrup in that yummy soda keeps you from feeling really hungry even though you've gobbled down a huge meal from a caloric perspective. That's just not a good mix. The soda also increases the acidity of your blood, which you can read more about here: http://www.thefitclubnetwork.com/2009/11/how-diet-soda-makes-you-fat/

So, given the range of alternatives and the benefits of protein is it any surprise that the P90X Nutrition Plan focuses on it so much in the first Phase of the diet? Hopefully, all that makes sense. If not, shoot me an email at dave@thefitclubnetwork.com.

Dave

FitRunner
01-26-2010, 08:56 AM
Thanks for this post, Dave - I've certainly wondered as I've been making my diet spreadsheet!

I only have one question (because the last time I look biology was in high school) - what is the difference between a starchy carb molecule and a non-starchy carb molecule? Aren't all digestible carbs broken down into simple sugars?

I dug a little further on the effect of carbs on blood sugar and came up with, more or less, proponents of the Atkins Diet, so I know there's a limit somewhere I passed in the logic without noticing. :eek: Any idea where it is? :confused:

Dave
01-26-2010, 10:14 AM
Thanks for this post, Dave - I've certainly wondered as I've been making my diet spreadsheet!

I only have one question (because the last time I look biology was in high school) - what is the difference between a starchy carb molecule and a non-starchy carb molecule? Aren't all digestible carbs broken down into simple sugars?

I dug a little further on the effect of carbs on blood sugar and came up with, more or less, proponents of the Atkins Diet, so I know there's a limit somewhere I passed in the logic without noticing. :eek: Any idea where it is? :confused:

Hey Teresa,

This video explains the metabolic process: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNYlIcXynwE&feature=player_embedded. Sounds like you understand that already, and I may have even posted it above (duh). Anyway, this needs to be the foundation of the conversation.

You are exactly correct. All carbs get broken down into sugar...eventually. The question is how long that takes. Complex carbs take longer to digest...typically. I just posted a response to your question on Phase I of the Nutrition Plan. In that response, I encouraged you to get your carbs from fruits and veggies. Two reasons: (1) they are more typically complex in nature; and (2) only a portion of the food is carbohydrate. There's a system overload with a bowl of pasta. That tends not to happen when you have a veggie that has other valuable micro/macro nutrients.

Here are some resources:

http://www.marksdailyapple.com/simple-complex-carbohydrates/

http://www.marksdailyapple.com/muscle-building-and-carbs/

So, there you have it. I am reading Mark Sisson's book now and the central theory is controling your body's production of insulin. Whether you buy into Mark's theory that our primal ancestors were healthier because they didn't farm grain is irrelevant. The metabolic process, is what it is. Overload the body with carbs and insulin comes knocking.

Fat is the missing element in this discussion. The basic diet consists of some distribution of protein/carbs/fat. If we agree that too much protein can have an adverse impact on the kidneys and that excess carbs cause an adverse insulin response, then fat is the logical place to look for the rest of the diet. Many people are starting to believe that the fat cells are actually very efficient storage bins for readily available energy. This is another thing that I'm really learning more and more about. I can tell you that I have been increasing my intake of fat (mostly monounsaturated) for about 4 months, and I've never felt better.

The interesting thing will be to see how all this fits in with training for a 1/2 Ironman, which I'm about 6 weeks into. I know one thing, I'm not going to just charge down bowls of spag like I used to. I'm also not going to completely cut carbs. A challenge looms. Good thing I'm interested in this stuff, huh?

Dave

FitRunner
01-26-2010, 12:54 PM
Hmmm... sounds like perhaps I'm being more literal-minded or detail-oriented than most of these conversations warrant. I'm an engineer and so when I was crunching the numbers for the diet, I did what I always do, I went and found a standards database with reference data (in this case the USDA nutritional database), set up a spreadsheet (much to the ridicule of my husband :p), and started a trial-and-error process of making the numbers work: total calories consumed, ratios of calories from fat, protein, and carbs, and budget. :o

This means I've been counting fruits and veggies loosely as carbs, since most of the calories in them are from carbohydrates of some sort. Mark's Apple really suggests to me that the word 'carb' may not mean exactly the same group of molecules and/or sources of those molecules and/or amounts of them every time. I figured that since all produce contain a lot of carbohydrates relative to their calorie counts, they should be explicitly considered when you're assessing your carbohydrate consumption.

I guess either way it's pretty hard to overload your body with carbs from fruit and veggies. You tend to get full before you've consumed as many of them as with pasta :D

I do have to say I don't think I could give up bread completely... there's nothing like a stack of sliced mushrooms on hearty rye bread, or a thin slice of cheese on really rustic and dense rye bread. Or sardines on rye bread... or grated carrots... :D

Links monetized by VigLink